Excerpted from a ThinkProgress blog by Casey Quinlan
The Trump administration wants to encourage states to conduct drug tests for people seeking unemployment insurance — a practice labor and drug policy experts largely agree is costly for states and shames people who need financial assistance.
The Labor Department finished seeking public comments this month on a rule that gives states more flexibility, allowing them to move forward with legislation to require drug testing for a far larger group of unemployment compensation applicants than the previous Rule permitted. The department said the “flexibility is intended to respect the diversity of States’ economies and the different roles played by employment drug testing in those economies.”
Michele Evermore, senior researcher and policy analyst at the National Employment Law Project, said this will discourage people from filing for unemployment, which they already struggle to do out of feelings of shame.
“A lot of people don’t apply for unemployment insurance because they don’t think they are eligible but people also don’t apply because of the stigma,” she said. “This is an earned benefit people should consider they have a right to when they become unemployed through no fault of their own.”
Under the Middle Class Tax Relief and Jobs Creation Act of 2012, there were only narrow circumstances in which states could drug test for unemployment insurance, where testing was limited to jobs that require carrying a firearm, motor vehicle operators, carry passengers, aviation flight crew members and railroad operating crews. But in 2018, Republicans used the Congressional Review Act to repeal the Obama-era rule. Under the law, the Labor Department still had to put forward a rule on the issue, which is why the department is now discussing drug testing everyone who applies for unemployment insurance.
Now that the public comment period is over, the Labor Department has to analyze and respond to the public’s comments. The department will then move forward with the rulemaking process.
Evermore said the department is saying that states can define what an occupation that regularly conducts drug testing is and establish a factual basis for allowing this drug testing.
If states took advantage of this rule broadening drug testing, however, it would be costly. The administrative funds states receive for unemployment insurance is based on unemployment rates and since the unemployment rate is low, states don’t have a lot of funds to work with, Evermore said.
Mississippi, Texas, and Wisconsin laws call for drug testing for their unemployment insurance programs. States have also shown a willingness to spend thousands of dollars to drug test people who apply for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) benefits. In 2017, for example, states spent more than $490,000 to drug-test 2,541 people who had applied for TANF. These tests yielded 301 positive tests, according to a ThinkProgress analysis.
Grant Smith, deputy director of national affairs at Drug Policy Alliance, said the rule is out of step” with the direction the country is headed when it comes to addressing addiction. The trend towards marijuana legalization “sets up further exacerbation of the conflict between federal and state law and would penalize people for acting in accordance with their state law,” he added.
“We’ve seen employers move away from even testing for marijuana so if the goal for DOL is to get an individual to be employable by testing them, it doesn’t make sense to be testing for marijuana when employers aren’t even looking for that anymore. Increasingly, because people are in compliance with state law, it’s becoming more of an impediment to hiring people when they test as a condition of providing an offer of employment or during the course of employment.”
A 2017 Quest Diagnostics Drug Testing Index study looking at drug screens in 2016 found that the rate of positive urine drug screens was at its highest since 2004. Behavioral Health Systems, a business that provides drug testing and other services, said many industries don’t test for marijuana because it would cause staffing issues. Some employers told the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) that because of how long marijuana stays in the body, they don’t bother testing for it, since it doesn’t tell them if workers were impaired during their jobs. At the same time, a 2017 Federal Reserve survey showed employers were concerned that an inability for applicants to pass drug tests made hiring a challenge.
Evermore said there is a potential for a legal challenge to this rule based on the Fourth Amendment. In the past, courts have rejected governments’ mandated use of suspicionless drug-testing for public assistance. When Florida allowed mandatory drug testing for people seeking Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), the ACLU challenged it. A federal judge sided with the ACLU in 2011 and said that testing urine for drugs is a search and that the ability to apply for a public benefit like TANF could not depend on something unconstitutional.
GroupOne Background Screening’s webinar series will continue Thursday, April 6 with “Is the Résumé Authentic? Candidate Assessment in the Modern World” from 1:00-2:00 p.m., CT. You don’t want to miss this “Hot Topic” event with our expert speakers David Graves, HR guru and sales rep, and Danny Davila, director of FCRA Regulatory Risk. Fraudulent résumés
Did you know March 13-17 is Healthcare Human Resources (HR) Week? What an important opportunity to recognize HR professionals in healthcare organizations throughout the nation for their vital role across the continuum of care. On behalf of GroupOne Background Screening, we extend our sincere appreciation to each of you as HR providers in the crucial
The TikTok countdown has begun. On February 28, the White House issued a memorandum requiring federal employees to remove the TikTok application from any government device within 30 days. This memo, which continues a trend across several U.S. states including Texas, is the result of an act passed by Congress that requires the removal of TikTok from
The first of what is expected to be many lawsuits over an employer’s use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools when hiring was filed February 21, 2023. As noted in past blogs, such tools have caught the attention of the White House and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The class action lawsuit was filed against Workday, Inc. in